Their Challenge
Lexicon, an important steel industry company, had been led by a charismatic, autocratic founder for decades, who stepped down due to health. The new CEO felt that attracting and retaining talented people was important to the organization’s future and recognized that new generations were not responsive to the Lexicon history of autocratic, “When I say jump, just ask how high” management.
The CEO also felt that innovation is key to their future success. The CEO was out to establish his credibility and that of his leadership team because some of the executives were approaching retirement and were soon to be replaced.
Our Approach
Conversant interviewed the executive team members and their direct reports to understand their purposes, concerns and circumstances. We worked with the CEO and 30 influential colleagues to develop a Strategy Story that became the basis for communication, engagement and strategy implementation across the entire company.
To improve team performance and ongoing leadership development, we worked with the Executive Team to develop succession plans by having the close-to-retirement leaders mentor successors. With our DecisionStyles assessment, executives and their direct reports coordinated their talents to improve alignment and execution.
The Impact
- The CEO said, “Conversant came to us just in time. We are communicating better, we are more aligned, decisions are better understood. Our new strategic imperatives are clear and well-supported and relationships with our people, the quality of our work and our safety record are all better than ever.”
- In 2020, in the midst of the health and economic breakdowns due to the COVID-19 crisis, Lexicon, Inc had the most successful revenue and profit year in its history.
- In the wake of a charismatic founder, the new CEO has established himself as an admired, trusted leader for the next era of Lexicon success.
Conversant came to us just in time. We are communicating better, we are more aligned, decisions are better understood. Our new strategic imperatives are clear and well-supported and relationships with our people, the quality of our work and our safety record are all better than ever.
- CEO of Lexicon
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the most common causes of poor team performance in organizations?
Poor team performance most often results from misaligned priorities, unclear accountabilities, and a leadership culture that suppresses honest conversation. When team members cannot surface concerns or make real decisions together, execution suffers. Leadership transitions, siloed departments, and inadequate succession planning compound these problems. The Lexicon case demonstrates that shifting from an autocratic management culture to a trust-based, conversation-led leadership model directly improved strategic alignment, safety records, and financial performance – including record results during the COVID-19 crisis in 2020.
How does conversation-based coaching improve team performance?
Conversation-based coaching improves team performance by targeting the quality of dialogue between leaders and their teams – not just processes or skills. When leaders develop the capacity to listen deeply, surface misalignment early, and resolve breakdowns through purposeful conversation, teams become more coordinated and decisive. Conversant’s DecisionStyles assessment and Conversation Meter help leaders and teams diagnose where alignment is breaking down and correct it through structured, intentional conversation rather than restructuring or policy changes.
What is the difference between team coaching and team training?
Team training delivers predefined content – frameworks, tools, or competencies — in a structured format, with participants expected to apply knowledge independently afterward. Team coaching is an ongoing, adaptive engagement focused on how a specific team actually functions: how members make decisions, surface conflict, and align around shared priorities. Conversant’s team performance work is coaching-led rather than training-led, meeting each team in their real organizational context and building capabilities that are applied directly within the existing team dynamic.
How do you align a team around shared goals when priorities conflict?
Aligning a team through competing priorities requires surfacing disagreements explicitly rather than managing them around. Effective approaches include shared strategy narratives, clear accountability mapping, and structured conversations designed to resolve competing commitments. Conversant’s work with Lexicon involved developing a Strategy Story – a shared narrative that aligned the CEO and 30 influential leaders, creating a common basis for decision-making and strategic communication across the entire organization, even as it navigated significant leadership succession challenges.
How long does it take to see measurable improvement in team performance after an intervention?
Initial improvements in communication quality and decision clarity typically emerge within 30 to 90 days of a structured team performance intervention. Sustained gains – stronger execution, reduced conflict, and measurably better alignment – develop over 6 to 12 months as new practices become part of how the team operates. In Conversant’s engagement with Lexicon, the organization achieved record revenue and profit results within the same fiscal year their leadership alignment work was completed, demonstrating how rapidly behavioral change can translate into measurable business outcomes.

